Re: Phil. 2:6-11 - Christ and Caesar?
Phil. 2:6-11 - Christ and Caesar? By: andrew (5 replies) Sun, 27/05/2007 - 15:57
- Re: Phil. 2:6-11 - Christ and Caesar? By: Ryan SA (21/07/2008 - 20:37)
- Re: Phil. 2:6-11 - Christ and Caesar? By: andrew (22/07/2008 - 00:05)
- Christ and Caesar? maybe not... By: ninjaaron (09/06/2007 - 03:14)
- The form of God By: Andrew (12/06/2007 - 10:24)
- RE: the form of God By: ninjaaron (13/06/2007 - 06:06)
- The form of God By: Andrew (12/06/2007 - 10:24)



Re: Phil. 2:6-11 - Christ and Caesar?
Ryan, I don’t think that the anti-imperial theme necessarily precludes a reference to Christ’s pre-existence, though it would not make the smoothest sense of the text.
But I wonder if there isn’t further dependence here on Ezekiel 28:1-19. The prince of Tyre, who is the type of the imperial blasphemer who grasps at equality with God, claimed in effect to be ’in the form of a god’ (cf. 28:6 LXX: ’you have set your heart as the heart of a god’). Perhaps the ’hymn’ depicts Jesus as one who did have this oneness with God, who revealed in himself the true character of God, but nevertheless took on the form of a servant, who suffered and died. The references to Adam may also be relevant:
The prince of Tyre was perfect, as Adam was - a ’seal of resemblance’ (homoiōsiōs). But iniquity was found in him, he sinned, he became arrogant because of his beauty and his wisdom was corrupted (28:15-17). Christ had the same perfection, the same likeness to Adam, who was in the image of God, but did not become arrogant and disobedient.